null

null

null

null

null

null

null

null

null

null

null

null

null

null

Net debt/EBITDA ~1.5x; a 20% EBITDA decline would push leverage to ~1.9x, still within typical covenant limits of 3.0x

~60% of debt is fixed-rate; a 20% rise in variable-rate interest costs adds ~CAD 8-12M annually, modest vs. CAD 500M+ EBITDA

Medium intensity; US-China trade tariffs on metals and components disrupt supply chains.

Talent availability in English-speaking markets and specialized engineering software licensing (Bentley, Autodesk) are primary chokepoints

Top three international markets: UK (GBP), Australia (AUD), Middle East (USD-pegged); GBP and AUD devaluation are moderate exposure risks

Revenue split ~55% US, ~20% Canada, ~10% UK, ~8% Australia, ~7% other; GBP/AUD volatility represents primary devaluation exposure

Medium intensity; commodities: Steel, Aluminum, Copper, Crude Oil (fuel), Rare Earth Elements, Plastics/Resins; geopolitical: US-China trade tariffs on metals and components disrupt supply chains.

No single vendor exceeds 30% of input costs; Autodesk/Bentley software is significant but substitutable over 12-24 months

Professional services firm; cloud dependency is low—project delivery relies on on-premise and distributed tools, not single-cloud infrastructure

B2B professional engineering and consulting services; cloud termination would cause disruption but not existential failure within 30 days

Low API coupling risk; Stantec uses internal project management and third-party CAD/BIM tools with no critical single-API dependency

Not applicable; revenue from fee-for-service engineering contracts fails Howey Test—no investment of money in common enterprise with profit expectation

Medium

Moderate GDPR exposure via UK/EU project data; CCPA exposure limited but growing as California infrastructure work scales; compliance programs in place

Low antitrust risk; fragmented global engineering market with no dominant market share; acquisitions are bolt-on and unlikely to trigger regulatory scrutiny

Medium burden; regimes: FAA, DOT, OSHA, EPA, ITAR, FTC; Export controls and defense procurement rules create contract concentration risk.

~75-80% recurring via multi-year contracts and retainers; ~20-25% transactional project-based; backlog of ~CAD 6.5B provides strong revenue visibility

Fee-for-service professional engineering and consulting; billed on time-and-materials or lump-sum fixed-price contracts across infrastructure sectors

Blended hourly billing rates (~USD 150-250/hr average); fixed-price contracts expose margin risk if scope creeps; inflation pass-through is partial

Moderate; 3-5% annual rate card increases typical; competitive RFP processes limit unilateral pricing power; differentiated by technical reputation

Gross margin ~55-58% on net revenue (net of subconsultant costs); EBITDA margin ~14-16%; in line with large engineering peers

No meaningful free-rider leakage; proprietary deliverables (reports, designs) are client-specific with no public-good externality

Revenue growth is headcount-near-linear; ~70% of costs are labor; doubling revenue requires ~80-85% headcount increase unless digital/AI tools scale

Sublinear only marginally via shared services and technology leverage; organic growth remains largely labor-driven with ~15% operational leverage

Not applicable; Stantec is a fully integrated firm with no franchise network—offices are wholly owned subsidiaries

At 10x scale, CAC would rise significantly as talent competition intensifies; current win rates ~35-40% on pursuits with CAC embedded in BD overhead (~3-5% of revenue)

Weak network effects; reputation and repeat client relationships provide stickiness but no true platform-scale network effect

AI displacement risk moderate-high for junior roles (report writing, drafting); senior engineering judgment remains hard to automate; 5-10 year horizon

Tier 2 recession-resistant; government-funded infrastructure (~60% of revenue) is counter-cyclical; private-sector work (~40%) is more vulnerable

Government and public sector agencies (federal, state/provincial, municipal); ~60% of revenue; provides stability and long contract cycles

Private sector: utilities, energy, real estate developers; ~40% of revenue; higher margin but more cyclically sensitive

["11-0000 Management Occupations", "13-0000 Business and Financial Operations Occupations", "15-0000 Computer and Mathematical Occupations", "17-0000 Architecture and Engineering Occupations", "23-0000 Legal Occupations", "33-0000 Protective Service Occupations", "37-0000 Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations", "41-0000 Sales and Related Occupations", "43-0000 Office and Administrative Support Occupations", "47-0000 Construction and Extraction Occupations", "49-0000 Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations", "51-0000 Production Occupations", "53-0000 Transportation and Material Moving Occupations"]

0.3 (HIL — ~30% of characteristic roles agent-automatable)

Low capex model (~2-3% of revenue); investment shifting toward digital/technology tools and M&A-driven growth rather than legacy physical infrastructure

0001131383

STN